On Wed, 2007-01-17 at 15:36 +0000, Gordon Sim wrote: > Alan Conway wrote: > I don't see a need to provide interop between 0.8 and 0-9. Me neither.
> My question > was whether we aim to be 0-9 'compliant' and whether that would be > possible if we only implemented the WIP parts. When you say 'we are > first aiming to get 0-9 working' do you mean the WIP part only? Yes. Right now the C++ branch doesn't comply with anything. I want to get WIP framing & message class working first, then add back Basic (over new framing) and finally protocol detection and old framing option (allowing WIP or Basic over old or new framing.) Cheers, Alan.
