Hi Thomas,

I am intending to apply all your patches and give them a quick look over
before recomending that they are committed (I'm not a committer but can ask
someone here at JPMC to do it). Right now, I've been a bit busy writing
performance tests to have a chance to do this. Hopefully, I will get a
chance to do so towards the end of this week.

As for the intention of the code... As I understand it, it was mostly
written by Steve Shaw who was my predecessor here at JPMC. I am totally new
to the code, so having to figure it out as I go. There's not many (any?)
comments in the code, and nothing in the wiki. Not very helpfull, but that
seems to be the state of play.

Rupert

On 1/24/07, Tomas Restrepo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Robert,

> > I think definitely there's some opportunity there for improvement in
the
> > whole Qpid.Buffer project, but I'm not quite sure yet I understand how
it
> > all fits together. Any comments?
>
> It's probably worth as a first step seeing how much of it is actually
> used, Some may have been copied across but is not really required.

I'd be happy to help a bit in this part by building a good set of unit
tests
for the buffers and do some refactoring. That said, I would appreciate it
if
someone could explain a bit what the code does and a bit of the structure
and relations between the classes (the explanation for the java code would
probably suffer).


Tomas Restrepo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.winterdom.com/weblog/




Reply via email to