On Wed, 2007-01-24 at 16:15 -0500, Carl Trieloff wrote: > Alan Conway wrote: > > ... Stuff about looking at a replacement for apr
> Why not focus on the native posix one first? > > Carl. I think this came from the requirement to use SSL, which the new native layer wouldn't do. Having said that I tend to agree we should get that done first, as I think the refactoring involved will be useful for any further work. Or at least it should be a move in that direction if done corredctly. Andrew
