Sorry Alan - didn't you write the comments ? Apologies if I've misunderstood somewhere along the lines ....
I would understand M1 as a production release, and it only includes the Java components. Unless anyone objects I'll update the page to make that clear for M1/Java? Regards, Marnie On 2/23/07, Alan Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
John O'Hara wrote: > I agree, we're using Qpid/Java M1 for some fairly serious production > work; > and would I would encourage other early adopters to consider doing so. > They won't be the first. > > Is the report a reflection of the state of the C++ broker, or something > else? Don't know the intent of the comments but C++ is not production quality yet in my view, so if we mark the Java release as such we need to make that clear. Cheers, Alan.
