[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-24?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12483556
]
Arnaud Simon commented on QPID-24:
----------------------------------
The AMQP transaction SIG has reached consensus on defining dtx classes. All the
documents are available on the transaction SIG wiki page:
https://wiki.108.redhat.com/wiki/index.php/AMQP:Transaction_SIG
This should be voted during the next PMC and dtx classes should be part of the
next AMQP specs.
The C++ broker already implements dtx support.
I would like to now concentrate on the Java broker to extend the current
solution with dtx capabilities. I really think that java and C++ code sources
should be as similar as possible. This is why I would like us to agree on
common java/C++ interfaces for transaction and persistence stores. When agreed,
I am volunteer to refactor the existing java code source and to implement dtx
support.
> Extend Qpid transaction functionality to support distributed transactions
> (JTA)
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: QPID-24
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-24
> Project: Qpid
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Java Broker, Java Client
> Reporter: Marnie McCormack
> Fix For: M2
>
>
> Our current transaction code does not support JTA and XA. Whilst this
> functionality is not required for JMS compliance, it is suported by
> comparable products (ActiveMQ, SonicMQ, IBM MQ Series) and we have had
> questions about distributed transaction support from our users.
> See section 8 of the JMS specification for details.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
