All, Does anyone want to volunteer to manage the M2 release ?
I'm afraid that I cannot, for personal/biological reasons. I think M2 is pretty important for Apache Qpid in terms of progress, and making a reasonably robust project available to download/use. Now easy on the stampede ...... :-) Thanks & Regards, Marnie On 3/15/07, Rajith Attapattu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Marnie, Hey np, I will take care of it. take it easy, Rajith On 3/15/07, Marnie McCormack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Rajith, > > I'm happy for you to cut the branch (across all included technologies) - > thanks. > > On the release management front, I'm afraid I'll have to opt out as I'm > heavily loaded at the moment. I'm also heavily pregnant so working to a > tight schedule to get everything I need to do done before riding off into > the sunset :-) > > I'll still be around whilst I'm on maternity leave, but a little less > available ! > > Bfn, > Marnie > > On 3/15/07, Rajith Attapattu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Marnie, > > > > If all parties are happy I can cut a branch for the release in the next > > hour. > > Marnie would u like to be the release manager for this release ? > > > > Regards, > > > > Rajith > > > > On 3/15/07, Marnie McCormack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Ah. Good news and bad, imho. Happy to include Ruby but a little > > concerned > > > that it's not going to be release-able for reasons other than the code > > :-) > > > > > > Regards, > > > Marnie > > > > > > > > > On 3/15/07, Carl Trieloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Marnie, > > > > > > > > 3 +1's means that the vote carries, and as we have no -1's or 0's > all > > > > the components in the vote > > > > should be included in M2. i.e. Ruby carried also so it must be > > included. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Carl. > > > > > > > > > > > > Marnie McCormack wrote: > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your votes and input on the M2 Release vote thread. > > > > > > > > > > I have now tallied up the votes cast, and they look like this: > > > > > > > > > > [ +8 ] M2 Release inc Java, C++, .NET > > > > > [ +6 ] Python client (plus 2 abstentions) > > > > > [ +3 ] Ruby client (plus 5 abstentions) > > > > > > > > > > My reading of the discussions thus far is that the python is > fairly > > > well > > > > > used and thus maintained. The Ruby seems a bit behind this in > status > > > and > > > > > will shortly be subject to some additional effort (hopefully from > > > > Kevin). > > > > > > > > > > Thus, I'd conclude that we should concentrate our efforts on an M2 > > > which > > > > > only includes: > > > > > > > > > > Java Broker (with a caveat on the clustered broker code) > > > > > Java Client > > > > > C++ Broker > > > > > C++ Client > > > > > .NET Client > > > > > Python Client > > > > > > > > > > I hope that this tallies up with the group consensus. I'll email > > > > > separately > > > > > on release branching and management. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > > Marnie > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
