The plan is to get M2 to a releasable point, and for it to be the final,
stable, version of Qpid that uses the 0-8 version of the protocol.  Fixes we
add to M2 will be merged down on to trunk.

The multi-version stuff being checked into trunk was (unfortunately) my
error...  The only one of those changes that I haven't backed out is changes
to the code generator to allow it to use Velocity templates as well as the
original template format.

trunk for the C++ now has 0-9 support I believe... I'm not sure whether
we'll bother with 0-9 support on the Java side, or jump straight to 0-10.
AMQP 0-10 (which isn't finalised yet) is going to be a much bigger jump.
All refactoring type work should be aimed at trunk also, I think...

Thoughts?

Rob


On 19/04/07, Martin Ritchie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Trunk should be where we do all our new development. I'm using M2 for
bug fixing a few issues though some of them "fixes" seem to be more
like new features. I hope to be merging my changes to trunk next week.
So we can all work forward on trunk.

On 19/04/07, Tomas Restrepo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> OK, bit the bullet and checked out a copy of the M2 branch as well.
>
> > (P.S. It would seem the multiple protocol versions support in the java
> > client causes it to freak out when it gets a connection.start method
> > with an
> > unsupported protocol version).
>
> Scratch that. The M2 branch freaks out as well on an unexpected protocol
> version.
>
>
> Tomas Restrepo
> http://www.winterdom.com/weblog/
>
>
>
>
>


--
Martin Ritchie

Reply via email to