[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-197?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Martin Ritchie updated QPID-197:
--------------------------------

    Fix Version/s: M3

> Consistent configuration for C++ and Java brokers.
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: QPID-197
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-197
>             Project: Qpid
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: C++ Broker, C++ Client, Dot Net Client, Java Broker, 
> Java Client, Java Common, JMS Compliance
>            Reporter: Alan Conway
>             Fix For: M3
>
>
> Define a consistent configuration story between the C++ and Java brokers. 
> - Define a common configuration model: naming conventions, type system.
> - Define standard configuration settings for features suported in both 
> brokers.
> - Define naming conventions to avoid using the same config name with 
> different meanings in each broker
> The brokers will have some language specific settings for things that are 
> different between the two, but wherever it's reasonable we should define 
> common settings. 
> Both brokers will support multiple config formats (e.g. XML, property file, 
> boost config file, the set of supported formats will be different (e.g. Java 
> properties vs C++ command line args)
> The brokers may or may not share a common file format, depending on the 
> solutions adopted by each. If they do share a common format, it should be 
> possible to identify common vs. language specific settings so either broker 
> can  use the same config file without being confused by settings intended for 
> the other.
> See also: QPID-104

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to