Hi All, Just to mention that there are already one/two JIRAs created for writing/plugging in a persistent store and perhaps also for the JDBC/SQL route.
Probably have low-ish numbers ! Great to see this stuff moving forward - thanks Arnauld ! Bfn, Marnie On 5/10/07, John O'Hara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You make it sound so easy </awe> john On 03/05/07, Arnaud Simon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Rob, > > I was thinking about that actually. I think I'll do it as this is a very > useful feature to have. So, I have added this task on my TODO list. > > Cheers > > Arnaud > > > > > On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 11:52 +0100, Robert Godfrey wrote: > > Hi Arnuad, > > > > what other stores are you writing? > > > > We *really* could do with a persistent store that has Apache > > compatible licensing... even if it's not the most efficient it would > > at least enable us to add persistence testing to our unit tests. > > > > I started on looking at writing an JDBC/SQL based store for this > > purpose but would need to change it now you've made your changes. If > > you're already looking at this, then I won't bother. > > > > Cheers, > > Rob > > > > On 03/05/07, Arnaud Simon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > There was one path mistake in the config file that I checked in but > > > Gordon has spotted it and solved it (Thanks for that Gordon). > > > > > > Apart from that I am still working on having all the test cases > passing > > > against all the stores. So, I would encourage you not to use the > current > > > revision for production. I'll let you know when everything has been > > > tested. I am also adding crash recovery tests that are useful for > > > testing tx. > > > > > > I have also updated the in-memory store and tx manager that were not > > > properly implemented but required (I'll produce a new patch soon). > Note > > > that the BDB implementation is checked in under etp.108.redhat.com. I > > > have also other stores that are not yet finalized. > > > > > > One main thing that we need to change though is the way message chunks > > > are handled. At the minute this not really optimum. > > > > > > So, to summarize my plan for action for this week and next week is: > > > 1) finalize in memory store and tx > > > 2) have all the tests rewritten for the new store and tx interfaces > > > 3) have all the tests (Junit and system) passing against all the > stores > > > 4) add crash recovery tests > > > 5) extend dtx support > > > 6) finalize new stores > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
