There are some tests for the retrotranslated client code, or rather the client code and anything in the integrationtests module are both retrotranslated (but not systemtests as it has a broker dependency, does they use an in VM broker?) so can be run together to check the build is still 1.4 compatible. Retrotranslator seems pretty good, but there are still some gaps, so I hope Mina 1.1 doesn't discover any of them.
+1 Rupert On 22/05/07, Robert Godfrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm +1 for moving to Mina 1.1 The client code already requires Java 5 to compile, and our 1.4 strategy is to use the retrotranslator. -- Rob On 22/05/07, Martin Ritchie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi. > > Just wanted to get the lists thoughts on upgrading our dependencies > such as mina for the M2 release. Currently the mina we use requires > backport utils but we could upgrade to the fully java 5 version. Does > anyone have any thoughts or reasons why we shouldn't do this now? It > would be good to upgrade as a number of bugs have been fixed since the > 1.0.0 we downgraded to. > > -- > Martin Ritchie >
