On 07/06/07, Robert Godfrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
One thing I think needs to be made clear in the AMQP spec are which "classes" are meant for end-user use and which classes are meant only for use by the "library".
I think nearly everyone can unite in the opinion that the term "class" as used in the AMQP specification is a poorly chosen one.
I think the mapping of our JMS implementation to AMQP needs to be somewhat clearer...
I think that a mapping specification from the AMQP group is going to be important (but probably not worth looking at until at least 0-11 due to the scope of changes). RG
