On 14/06/07, Martin Ritchie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 14/06/07, Martin Ritchie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 14/06/07, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Just FYI, on the Java side, if you add the snippet below to the
> > build/plugins section of parent pom, most of the issues for Incubator
> > requirements will be taken care of. It will add the META-INF/LICENSE,
> > META-INF/DISCLAIMER, create a META-INF/NOTICES file based on the
> > dependencies, etc...
> >
> > Dan
> >
> >
> > <plugins>
> > <plugin>
> > <artifactId>maven-remote-resources-plugin</artifactId>
> > <version>1.0-alpha-5</version>
> > <executions>
> > <execution>
> > <goals>
> > <goal>process</goal>
> > </goals>
> > <configuration>
> > <resourceBundles>
> >
> >
<resourceBundle>org.apache:apache-incubator-disclaimer-resource-bundle:1.1</resourceBundle>
> >
> > <resourceBundle>org.apache:apache-jar-resource-bundle:1.2</resourceBundle>
> > </resourceBundles>
> > <properties>
> > <addLicense>true</addLicense>
> > <projectName>Apache Qpid</projectName>
> > </properties>
> > </configuration>
> > </execution>
> > </executions>
> > </plugin>
> > </plugins>
> >
> >
> > On Wednesday 13 June 2007 20:46, Martin Ritchie wrote:
> > > Don't forget the actual tasks for the release process that we haven't
> > > created JIRAs for yet. I've updated the Java section on the M2 release
> > > page that Rajith made for the Java items. I would imagine that each of
> > > the language releases would have to do similar checks and file
> > > creations.
> > >
> > > On 14/06/07, Alan Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > The only items outstanding for C++ are QPID-510 and QPID-467. I'm
> > > > working on 510 (client bug), check with Rupert for 467 (interop
> > > > testing.)
> > > >
> > > > Assuming I fix the bug this week, I'm happy to release whenever
> > > > Rupert says he's happy with the interop coverage.
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 09:17 -0400, Rajith Attapattu wrote:
> > > > > Can all the key stake holders put some time lines for their tasks
> > > > > ? This will help us to fix a tentative date for the release. With
> > > > > out a date this release is likely to drag on.
> > > > >
> > > > > regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Rajith
> > > > >
> > > > > On 6/12/07, Rupert Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > I've updated one of the tasks for interop testing.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The "Identify JIRAs for inclusion in M2" task belongs to Marnie,
> > > > > > who is presumably willing to pass the responsibility for it on?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > AFAIK all M2 Jiras have been identified by Marnie already, looks
> > > > > > like the task remains open for release + showstoppers tasks.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Rupert
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 11/06/07, Rajith Attapattu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > Hi folks,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > several people inquired about the M2 status.
> > > > > > > I know this time around it is a bit more difficult as we have
> > > > > > > to get all java,c++,.NET and Python components ready for the
> > > > > > > release.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Can the respective state holders identified in the following
> > > > > > > url report their status and any issues
> > > > > > > http://cwiki.apache.org/qpid/m2-release.html
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Rajith
> >
> > --
> > J. Daniel Kulp
> > Principal Engineer
> > IONA
> > P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://www.dankulp.com/blog
>
> Thanks for the information Daniel. Would be great if you have the time
> to pop that snippet in to the pom so we are one step closer to being
> ready from the Java side.
>
> Cheers
Daniel,
Just remembered that you are not a committer. :) I shall try those
suggestions shortly.
Thanks
--
Martin Ritchie
Hi Daniel,
I added the plugin to our parent pom however the jars that are built
don't seem to have the META-INF content you point out above. Have I
done something wrong? I committed the change as it didn't break
anything but it would be good if you could take a look and see what is
wrong.
Regards
--
Martin Ritchie
