On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 10:45 +0100, Robert Greig wrote: > On 31/07/07, Rupert Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I don't see any point in promoting a 'developer friendly' API in Java that > > is not JMS. The developer friendly messaging API for java is JMS. > > I completely agree. > > RG
I don't agree as this interface should be used for exposing specific AMQP features. The real debate is whether we wrap the AMQP classes around a higher level API. I personally think that we should as there is no notion of AMQP API and we should not introduce one. So, we are thinking about defining a QPID QPI that may eventually impact upon the JMS one. Arnaud
