That was precisely my thinking. If we go to IPMC with the 3 mentor votes, then the Incubator folks will have more confidence in voting for us.
Regards, Rajith On Nov 8, 2007 9:28 AM, Carl Trieloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I know that we have to go to IPMC for vote also, however one vote early > in the > project we went to IPMC without mentor votes and we(qpid) got a > beating... So we > seem to have made it practice to ping the mentors and make sure at leasr > some > of the mentors have weighed in before we move the vote to IPMC. (that > avoids the where where your mentors discussion) > > Maybe just a case of once beaten twice shy > Carl. > > > Yoav Shapira wrote: > > Hey, > > > > On Nov 8, 2007 7:10 AM, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> According to: > >> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html > >> > >> All releases by podlings must be approved by the IPMC. The conventional > >> > > > > Daniel is correct, you always have to go to the IPMC. Once qpid is > > its own project outside the Incubator, obviously you'll only have one > > vote, the qpid vote, no IPMC involved. But while in Incubation, you > > need to go to the IPMC for approval. > > > > Here's my +1 for the release, good job! > > > > Yoav > > > > -- Rajith Attapattu Red Hat Blog http://mutlix.blogspot.com/
