+1 on graduating as a TLP. Rajith
On Jan 4, 2008 8:08 AM, Carl Trieloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ant elder wrote: > > > > > > On Jan 2, 2008 10:04 PM, Carl Trieloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > > > > > We have been discussed starting the graduation process once we had > > published M2. This has been completed so I would like to start a > > community vote. The first step in graduation: > > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#sp-community-vote > > > > This vote is for the qpid community to be willing to govern itself > > as a > > top level project. Please see the above link. If this vote passes, I > > will go ahead and prepare the relevant materials and complete the > > remaining process as from the above link. > > > > From my side I believe we are ready and I am willing... so here > > is my +1. > > > > Given it is a vacation week, I will leave the vote open till Tuesday > > January 9th, will tally votes on the 10th. > > Carl. > > > > > > > > That link above is to the "Graduating to a Subproject" part of the > > graduation guide, is qpid planning on graduating as a subproject of > > some other project or as a TLP? > > > > How is qpid doing with the minimum graduation requirements outlined > > at: > > > http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Minimum+Graduation+Requirements > > < > http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Minimum+Graduation+Requirements > > > > > > ...ant > > Ant, thanks for the interest. > > > From the discussions so far we would like to graduate as a TLP, that is > what this vote is to confirm (That we are willing to govern ourselves as > TLP). Here is where we are at in terms of the list on that page. > obviously the items that are dependent on this vote have not been done > yet. > > * > o All code ASL'ed -------------- done > o The code base must contain only ASL or ASL-compatible > dependencies --------- done > o License grant complete -------- done > o CLAs on file. ------- done > o Check of project name for trademark issues -------- done > (changes name 4 times when we came in for this issue) > > * *Meritocracy / Community * > * > o Demonstrate an active and diverse development community > ----------- yes > o The project is not highly dependent on any single > contributor (there are at least 3 legally independent > committers and there is no single company or entity that is > vital to the success of the project) ------------- yes > o The above implies that new committers are admitted according > to ASF practices ------------- yes > o ASF style voting has been adopted and is standard practice > ------------- yes > o Demonstrate ability to tolerate and resolve conflict within > the community. ------------ yes ( have had some large debates) > o Release plans are developed and excuted in public by the > community. ------------ yes > o > + (requirement on minimum number of such releases?) > ----------- done 2 releases, released all code > + Note: incubator projects are not permitted to issue an > official Release. Test snapshots (however good the > quality) and Release /plans /are OK. > o Engagement by the incubated community with the other ASF > communities, particularly infrastructure@ (this reflects my > personal bias that projects should pay an nfrastructure > "tax"). ------------ some of our committers do > o Incubator PMC has voted for graduation ------------ (not > yet, doing community vote first, then will do all admin, > charter etc, then call for IPMC vote) > o Destination PMC, or ASF Board for a TLP, has voted for final > acceptance --------- (not yet) > > * *Alignment / Synergy * > * > o Use of other ASF subprojects ------------ yes > o Develop synergistic relationship with other ASF subprojects > ---------- yes, have additional requests from other > projects, specifically maven targets. > > * *Infrastructure * > * > o SVN module has been created ------------ yes > o Mailing list(s) have been created --------- yes > o Mailing lists are being archived ---------- yes > o Issue tracker has been created ----------- yes > o Project website has been created ------------ yes > o Project ready to comply with ASF mirroring guidelines ----- yes > o Project is integrated with GUMP if appropriate --------- N/A > o Releases are PGP signed by a member of the community ------ > yes > o Developers tied into ASF PGP web of trust -------- I believe > most, something to be explicitly checked in this process. > > > The only piece of outstanding infra admin I know of is that we need to > add our latest two committers to the info page. One of the account > setups is still being resolved, so I will do that after they have both > been able to successfully so a ci. > > regards > Carl. > > > > > > -- Regards, Rajith Attapattu Red Hat blog: http://rajith.2rlabs.com/
