Yes, I wanted to compare with OpenAMQ and Rabbit. I think the 0.9 support added by Robert Godfrey is aimed at getting the client to talk to OpenAMQ? Could not get interop with Rabbit to work, despite making a few changes to the Java. I especially wanted to run perf tests against Rabbit after reading their 1.3M msgs/sec claims.
Issues that I know of with Rabbit are: Qpids lack of support for access tickets but Rabbit website says they use a Qpid compatible mode for that by default. Extra arguments on consume method. I removed those from the Java but it still would not work. Rupert On 10/01/2008, Robert Greig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 09/01/2008, Carl Trieloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Do we have out of the box interop > > > with Rabbit or OpenAMQ (subject to its limited feature set)? Do our > > > performance tests run unmodified against those brokers? > > > > > > > > no, lot of our test use JMS and both Rabbit and OpenAMQ are not rich > > enough to support that, can > > only get basics going before I gave up last time tried. Not even all the > > python test passed on them > > last I looked. > > OK they don't support full JMS but I should have thought that a lot > will work. We should certainly be able to do, for example, some > pub/sub tests. > > Did you try with M2.1 Carl? > > Rupert - do you have a feel for how much of your performance test > suite will run? It would be interesting to get comparative numbers > across AMQP implementations. > > RG >
