Carl Trieloff wrote:
Robert Godfrey wrote:
Another important point: The management-design-notes spec is
currently out
of date. I am in the process of cleaning up an updated version of this
document and will try to get it up on the Wiki in the next day or two.
Do we have / can we make a list of the operations that the management
interfaces in the Java and C++ provide.
I'm thinking that, at least in abstract terms, there should be a lot
of overlap.
If we can define a set of operations it should make it easier to
define the translations between technologies. Also we can then aim to
try to bring the two brokers' management capabilties closer together.
Just something like (this works best in fixed width fonts :-) )
| Object | Operation | Result
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Queue | getMessageCount | Integer count of number of messages
held on the queue
| | | (note this includes acquired messages
which have not
| | | yet been accepted
|----------|------------------|
-------------------------------------------------------
| Exchange | getBindings | Returns a list of (binding-key,
queue-name, argument)
| | | tuples representing the bindings to
this exchange
etc...
-- Rob
yes, that is the sane way to map it, here is the schema for the C++
broker
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/qpid/trunk/qpid/specs/management-schema.xml
It would also be good to know of any operations that the Java broker
has that the C++ broker does not, -- now it is readable :-)
Carl.
