On 27/04/2008, Senaka Fernando <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK. I thought that would be better too. But, what made me think twice is > that > if the mechanism was PLAIN the password is sent in clear text.
If you mean that people should not use PLAIN, then yes I agree. The Java broker supports CRAM-MD5 out of the box and I am sure the C++ guys would be very pleased if you were to implement CRAM-MD5 on the C++ side (assuming it does not already support it?). RG
