We managed to close out 40+ issues from 260-odd that were on the list to review, with a further 10 or so which I wasn't sure about in the python client.
Full log follows, but I did note that we have a quite a few patches outstanding on the management console still, and a few for the C++ client and broker which I didn't touch due to extreme ignorance. - Aidan [3:02 pm] aidan.x.skinner alrighty, it's time for Jira fest '08 #2! [3:02 pm] partychat0 ["martin"] ROCK! [3:02 pm] aidan.x.skinner rhs, rajith: you about? [3:02 pm] partychat0 ["rhs"] I'm about, but on the phone at the moment. [3:03 pm] partychat0 ["rob"] ditto [3:03 pm] partychat0 ["rhs"] But I can answer questions that don't involve applying too much of my brain. [3:03 pm] partychat0 ["rhs"] Such as "you about?" for example. [3:03 pm] partychat0 ["rob"] I will also answer questions that don't involve applying too much of rhs' brain [3:03 pm] aidan.x.skinner that's cool, I'm mostly just looking for a yes/no to "is it done" [3:03 pm] partychat0 ["rob"] Use "no" as the answer to all such questions [3:03 pm] aidan.x.skinner working from page 2 of this list http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&&pid=12310520&fixfor=-1&fixfor=12312117&fixfor=12312720&fixfor=12312116&fixfor=12312115&resolution=-1&sorter/field=priority&sorter/order=DESC&sorter/field=issuekey&sorter/order=ASC [3:04 pm] aidan.x.skinner QPID-677, Mr Ritchie... [3:05 pm] partychat0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am around if needed [3:05 pm] partychat0 ["martin"] I beleive this has been fixed. [3:05 pm] aidan.x.skinner please close it then [3:05 pm] aidan.x.skinner anyboyd know about QPID-681, Queue Message raw ptr -> manage ptr? [3:05 pm] aidan.x.skinner carl? [3:05 pm] partychat0 ["martin"] Rob can you rememeber the little change we made to the byte buffer in the broker about cloning? [3:06 pm] partychat0 ["martin"] and field table use? [3:06 pm] partychat0 ["rob"] I can remember [3:06 pm] partychat0 ["martin"] did we fix it? [3:06 pm] partychat0 ["rob"] y [3:07 pm] aidan.x.skinner rhs: QPID-691 testlib.py not honoring --borker? [3:08 pm] partychat0 ["rhs"] --borker is not a valid option [3:08 pm] partychat0 ["rob"] [3:08 pm] partychat0 ["rob"] --bork ? [3:08 pm] aidan.x.skinner [3:08 pm] aidan.x.skinner is --broker? [3:08 pm] partychat0 ["rhs"] I have no idea. [3:09 pm] partychat0 ["rhs"] You can assign it to me and I'll check it out. [3:09 pm] aidan.x.skinner ok [3:10 pm] aidan.x.skinner martin: qpid-700, did you check it? is it a problem with the changes to statemanager? [3:11 pm] aidan.x.skinner same deal with qpid-701 [3:11 pm] partychat0 ["martin"] haven't chekd FailoverExceptions... StateManager will throw what ever it is given [3:11 pm] partychat0 ["martin"] 701 can be closed [3:11 pm] partychat0 ["rob"] 704 canbe assigned to me [3:12 pm] aidan.x.skinner martin: please close then [3:12 pm] aidan.x.skinner rob: done [3:12 pm] aidan.x.skinner martin: then please check 707 [3:12 pm] partychat0 ["martin"] Shall do shortly I hope.. JIRA seems to have logged me out and won't le me in.. .waitiing for new password to arrive [3:12 pm] aidan.x.skinner oh, ok. i'll do it then [3:13 pm] partychat0 ["martin"] 707 can be closed.. or even replaced with a Make Dups OK != AutoAck [3:13 pm] aidan.x.skinner closed it [3:15 pm] partychat0 ["martin"] 721 seems invalid [3:15 pm] partychat0 ["martin"] TopicSessionTest is not commented out anywhere anymore [3:16 pm] aidan.x.skinner yeah, i reassigned it to me [3:16 pm] aidan.x.skinner just wanted to check that i was actually being run [3:16 pm] aidan.x.skinner anybody know about 735? [3:16 pm] aidan.x.skinner sending messages to an undeclared queue fails silently [3:17 pm] aidan.x.skinner and similarly 736, which is kind of the same thing when a queue has been deleted from the broker [3:17 pm] partychat0 ["martin"] only in 0-10 as there is no Return [3:17 pm] aidan.x.skinner shouldn't we be throuwing an exception then? [3:18 pm] partychat0 ["martin"] I think the 0-8 code path will [3:18 pm] partychat0 ["martin"] it does a check to see if the route is valid before had [3:18 pm] partychat0 ["martin"] which is what 736 is about [3:18 pm] partychat0 ["martin"] we need to be able to force a recheck of the destination [3:18 pm] aidan.x.skinner 736 is still valid? [3:18 pm] partychat0 ["martin"] yes [3:19 pm] aidan.x.skinner ok [3:19 pm] partychat0 ["martin"] I'd have to check the code to confirm that the 0-10 code does the same destination validation [3:19 pm] aidan.x.skinner i assigned it to arnaud to check [3:19 pm] aidan.x.skinner rajith: do you know what the status of QPID-739 is? [3:20 pm] aidan.x.skinner There was a commit against it, but I'm not sure if it fixed it entirely [3:20 pm] partychat0 ["martin"] Same with 741 [3:21 pm] aidan.x.skinner rhs: do you know anything about QPID-751? [3:22 pm] aidan.x.skinner I didn't think the python client did 0-10 [3:22 pm] aidan.x.skinner martin: 753 looks bad... [3:22 pm] partychat0 ["martin"] yeah... probabably means I just fixed it and didn't udpate anything [3:22 pm] partychat0 ["martin"] As it is assigned to me will checkit out [3:23 pm] aidan.x.skinner cheers [3:24 pm] aidan.x.skinner rhs: giving you QPID-757 to check as well [3:25 pm] aidan.x.skinner Rob: 761 still an issue? [3:26 pm] partychat0 ["martin"] yup [3:26 pm] aidan.x.skinner the next one I'm not sure about is 773 [3:26 pm] partychat0 ["martin"] Rob does the new Topic Exchange handle arguments correctly in the unbind? [3:26 pm] partychat0 ["rob"] in the sense that they are ignored [3:27 pm] partychat0 ["martin"] thats fine the n769 still stands [3:27 pm] partychat0 ["martin"] the unbind ignores the args [3:27 pm] partychat0 ["rob"] This is the correct behaviour for 0-10 [3:27 pm] partychat0 ["rob"] so it is not a defect [3:27 pm] partychat0 ["martin"] but not 08/0-9 [3:27 pm] partychat0 ["rob"] for 0-8/0-9 it is undefined [3:27 pm] partychat0 ["rob"] so it is not a bugthere either [3:29 pm] partychat0 ["martin"] rob does the new topic exchange know the difference between topics a.# and a.#.# [3:30 pm] partychat0 ["rob"] yes [3:30 pm] partychat0 ["martin"] sweet. [3:30 pm] partychat0 ["martin"] will just close off 769 as invalid then [3:30 pm] partychat0 ["rob"] i.e. it stores the non-normalised keys in the binding [3:30 pm] partychat0 ["rob"] (but routes on the normalised) [3:30 pm] partychat0 ["martin"] those were the phrases I couldn't type [3:31 pm] aidan.x.skinner Martin: QPID-825 is another candidate for the exception handling fixed dealie [3:33 pm] aidan.x.skinner and QPID-834 [3:34 pm] aidan.x.skinner and QPID-855 [3:38 pm] aidan.x.skinner rhs: is the RFC 1982 stuff finished for QPID-861? [3:38 pm] partychat0 ["martin"] 773 : ah yes closed [3:38 pm] partychat0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] yes that stuff is done [3:39 pm] partychat0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am reffering to QPID-861 [3:39 pm] aidan.x.skinner thanks [3:39 pm] aidan.x.skinner martin: qpid-873? [3:40 pm] aidan.x.skinner rajith, rhs: do either of you know about QPID-881? [3:40 pm] partychat0 ["martin"] 865 may be resolved but would need to check.. I'll take it and look [3:40 pm] partychat0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] checking [3:41 pm] aidan.x.skinner Martin: did you ever check QPID-888 post refactor? [3:41 pm] partychat0 ["martin"] IIRC yes [3:42 pm] aidan.x.skinner was it ok? [3:42 pm] partychat0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] I believe 881 was done, but I'd wait for conformation from rafi [3:43 pm] aidan.x.skinner martin: 895? [3:43 pm] aidan.x.skinner rhs: 901, is the java client using the final 0-10 spec? [3:43 pm] aidan.x.skinner (i don't see any other 0-10 spec in source, so...) [3:43 pm] partychat0 ["martin"] 895 : checking [3:44 pm] partychat0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] aidan we completed that [3:44 pm] aidan.x.skinner sweet [3:45 pm] partychat0 ["martin"] 865 : Still an issue... will put it back in the pool [3:47 pm] partychat0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] joined the chat [3:47 pm] aidan.x.skinner hey arnaud! [3:47 pm] partychat0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] hello [3:48 pm] aidan.x.skinner welcome back from you holiday, is QPID-939 still a problem? [3:49 pm] partychat0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] I believe it is fixed [3:49 pm] aidan.x.skinner ok. can you resolve it please? [3:49 pm] partychat0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] I thought we would have a "closing JIRA" meeting tomorrow [3:49 pm] aidan.x.skinner we were going to, but Martin's on holiday so we moved it to today, yesterday [3:51 pm] partychat0 ["martin"] Rob: RE: 888 and locking.. : Would be good to have some Java Doc on the QueueEntryList and the QueueEntryIterator to know that it doesn't throw a ConcurrentModificationException [3:52 pm] partychat0 ["rob"] yes - it would be good to have some Javadoc [3:53 pm] aidan.x.skinner rajith: is QPID-968 finished? [3:54 pm] partychat0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] looking [3:54 pm] aidan.x.skinner thanks [3:54 pm] partychat0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] yep done [3:54 pm] aidan.x.skinner arnaud: do you know what the status of QPID-881 is? [3:54 pm] partychat0 ["martin"] 895:resolved [3:55 pm] partychat0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] looking [3:55 pm] aidan.x.skinner Martin: 975? [3:56 pm] partychat0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Aidan: I believe QPID-881 is solved but we need to double check that with rhs [3:56 pm] aidan.x.skinner ok. rhs? [3:57 pm] aidan.x.skinner martin: then 997... [4:00 pm] aidan.x.skinner and then QPID-1k [4:02 pm] aidan.x.skinner where did we get to with the discussion of client property centralisation? QPID-1018 [4:03 pm] partychat0 ["martin"] 997 : .not still usse , 997: closed [4:04 pm] partychat0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] aidan: I believe we started the discussion with QPID-1018 [4:04 pm] partychat0 ["martin"] 1K : doesn't appear to have been fixed but it is a test issue. [4:04 pm] partychat0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] aidan: this is not solved though [4:04 pm] aidan.x.skinner ok [4:05 pm] aidan.x.skinner rajith: is QPID-1043 finished? [4:06 pm] aidan.x.skinner martin: QPID-1049? [4:06 pm] partychat0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] I completed the matrix to the best of my knowledge - I believe there maybe some inconsistencies w.r.t .NET [4:07 pm] partychat0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] can aidan/rob take an action item to verify the matrix and then we could close the ticket [4:07 pm] aidan.x.skinner where's the matrix? [4:08 pm] partychat0 ["martin"] 1049 : TopicExchange refactor did away with it .. will close [4:10 pm] aidan.x.skinner martin, arnuad: are we all done with moving systests to QpidTestCase? QPID-1079 [4:11 pm] partychat0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://cwiki.apache.org/qpid/download.html [4:11 pm] partychat0 ["martin"] Not all tests are QTCs [4:11 pm] partychat0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] aidan: I believe we are [4:11 pm] partychat0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] martin: which ones are not? [4:11 pm] partychat0 ["martin"] Mainly due to the moving all all system tests from client to systests last week [4:11 pm] aidan.x.skinner and, 1080, has anybody seen TopicSessiontest fail recently? [4:12 pm] aidan.x.skinner rajith: matrix looks mostly accurate, although java broker 0-10 'in progress' is a bit of a stretch [4:12 pm] partychat0 ["martin"] I'll just go with the first alphabetic test as proof [4:12 pm] partychat0 ["martin"] AMQQDeferedOrderingTest [4:13 pm] partychat0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] aidan - lol - little bit of marketing to keep folks interested [4:13 pm] aidan.x.skinner marketing only ~= lying [4:13 pm] partychat0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] well its only a semi lie, bcos we are doing bits and pieces there [4:14 pm] aidan.x.skinner yeeass [4:14 pm] aidan.x.skinner anyway [4:14 pm] aidan.x.skinner QueueBrowser*Test failing for anybody still? [4:14 pm] partychat0 ["martin"] nope [4:14 pm] aidan.x.skinner 1081 [4:17 pm] aidan.x.skinner Rob: QPID-1093 fixed by the refactor? [4:18 pm] aidan.x.skinner Arnaud: can you close or add more detail to 1094 please? [4:18 pm] aidan.x.skinner Martin: did 1101 get merged? [4:18 pm] aidan.x.skinner rajith: is 1102 finished? [4:20 pm] partychat0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] aidan: ok, I have closed it [4:20 pm] partychat0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] yep we can close 1102 now [4:20 pm] partychat0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] its been made the default transport now [4:23 pm] aidan.x.skinner cool [4:24 pm] aidan.x.skinner anraud: is 1106 still live? [4:24 pm] aidan.x.skinner and similar with 1109 [4:25 pm] aidan.x.skinner martin: 1117? [4:25 pm] partychat0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] aidan: 1106 it still live [4:26 pm] partychat0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] aidan: I believe we can close 1109 as we are now using the io transport [4:27 pm] aidan.x.skinner righyt ho [4:27 pm] partychat0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] rajith: I believe the io transport prevents the client app runnin gout of mmory, does it? [4:27 pm] aidan.x.skinner how about qpid 1123? [4:27 pm] partychat0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] yep [4:27 pm] aidan.x.skinner and 1127 [4:28 pm] aidan.x.skinner arnaud: both of those are assigned to you I believe [4:28 pm] partychat0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] aidan: checking [4:29 pm] aidan.x.skinner rajith: are you done with 1140? [4:29 pm] partychat0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] aidan: 1123 should be fixed but we need to ask rhs to close it [4:29 pm] partychat0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] looking [4:30 pm] partychat0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] yep its done, we can close 1140 [4:30 pm] partychat0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] aidan: I have closed 1127 [4:31 pm] aidan.x.skinner arnaud: what does rhs have to do with qpid 1123? [4:31 pm] aidan.x.skinner have there been subsequent fixes to address the actual issue, or just the timeout on the test? [4:31 pm] aidan.x.skinner rajith: 1141? [4:32 pm] partychat0 ["martin"] rajith: what class are you refering too? [4:32 pm] aidan.x.skinner arnaud: also, i meant to ask about qpid-1130 [4:32 pm] partychat0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] aidan: I has solved the threading issue [4:32 pm] partychat0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] aidan: so we need to ask him if he really did it [4:32 pm] aidan.x.skinner ah, ok. assigning to rafi for comment then... [4:33 pm] partychat0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] aidan: 1130 is closed [4:33 pm] aidan.x.skinner cool [4:34 pm] aidan.x.skinner rhs: are you in massive call hell? [4:36 pm] aidan.x.skinner rajith: are you done with QPID-1161? [4:39 pm] aidan.x.skinner rhs, martin: is 1184 fixed? [4:41 pm] partychat0 ["martin"] The change rhs made certainly seems to improve things.. thought I'd rather have one log with stout and stderr... thats just my preference. [4:41 pm] partychat0 ["martin"] not a real requirements [4:42 pm] aidan.x.skinner have added a comment as such [4:42 pm] aidan.x.skinner rajith? [4:42 pm] partychat0 ["martin"] ta [4:46 pm] partychat0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] looking - sorry didn't see the message [4:47 pm] aidan.x.skinner thanks [4:47 pm] partychat0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] testkit is done [4:47 pm] aidan.x.skinner thanks [4:47 pm] aidan.x.skinner and so are we! [4:48 pm] partychat0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] martin, aidan, when u get a chance pls check it out - details are in QPID-1161 [4:48 pm] aidan.x.skinner we managed to close out around 45 issues [4:48 pm] aidan.x.skinner from 260-something to 219 [4:48 pm] partychat0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] thats good progress [4:49 pm] aidan.x.skinner and there are a few which I assigned to rhs which can probably get closed as well but it was hard to tell
