> -----Original Message----- > From: Gordon Sim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2008 11:13 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: M3 Freeze > > > Andrew Stitcher wrote: > > On Thu, 2008-08-07 at 15:32 +0100, Martin Ritchie wrote: > >> 2008/8/7 Aidan Skinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >>> On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 11:31 AM, Andrew Stitcher > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> > >>>> I do think however that it would be worth holding M3 for > a few days (say > >>>> no more than 3) if it takes Steve a little longer than > that. I know this > >>>> could be regarded as the thin end of the wedge, but this > the first > >>>> significant platform port of the C++ broker and things > were bound to > >>>> show up. However IMO it would be a significant extra for > M3 so worth > >>>> waiting just a short while for. > >>> I'm okay with this going in if guys you are. :) > >>> > >> Are you suggesting holding the freeze till Monday as 'Last thing > >> Friday' == 'First thing Monday'? > > > > I actually meant 3 working days so last thing Weds, but I definitely > > don't want to wait longer than that, if it's not ready by > then, we just > > freeze anyway. But if you want to suggest sooner we can discuss. > > I think it would be good to make an exception specifically > for Steve's > windows port and allow a few more days for that (e.g. up to Wed). It
> will be really nice to get that in for M3 and its already > very nearly there. > > So I'd suggest not having a general delay in the freeze, but allowing > windows port patches to be submitted and applied by wed next week. > Steve, would that work for you? Yes, that would be great! Thank you for the support. -Steve
