On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 09:06 -0400, Carl Trieloff wrote: > > > > > > Would it have been better to have chosen qpid::qmf::... rather than > > ::qmf? > > > > I > > I would think that would be cleaner
Just to pile in on the "bike shed painting" discussion: I think that qpid::management would actually be a better top level namespace! The f in qmf is framework which is dispensable, but q - qpid, m = managenent. Andrew
