Danushka Menikkumbura wrote:
As far as I can see, this is wrong due to 3 reasons.
1. You can not resize "data" since it is a const.
2. Resizing a string is costly.
3. Copying stuff in to "data" alone is not sufficient as it is
necessary to set the content length in the header as well.
Hmmmm, that's too bad. I'd like to avoid creating a buffer and then
copying it over ("minimize the movement of data"). Is there a better way
to write binary data directly into the message contents without creating
a buffer first?
Jonathan
