2008/11/11 Aidan Skinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 10:44 PM, Carl Trieloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I think MINA is being tossed as we work to 0-10 in Java. Agree that the slow >> connection >> problem on private queues is un-related. > > This really can't wait to be fixed until we add new protocols to the > Java broker. 0-10 makes things a lot easier, in many ways, but the > basic problems remain the same and need to be fixed in similar ways. >
Once we have M4 out of the door I would like to discuss the work I've done for both the broker and 0-8 client allowing them to select alternative IO layers. For continuity stability it can use the existing MINA IO, but to address some of the issues being brought up here it can also be configured to use the Java 0-10 IO, or a similar NIO/selector based transport I wrote. While this won't answer all our issues it does offer one way of getting out from under some of the issues we've seen with MINA... and experimentally showed much improved performance for the Java Broker. -- Rob
