Well it does sound a little naff when put like that :P
On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 11:03 +0000, Aidan Skinner wrote: > On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 10:46 AM, Robbie Gemmell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Could do, although the issue there is that MX4J doesnt implement the JMXMP > > connector and instead have its own connectors based on soap, hessian, or > > burlap which all require Jetty or such like to communicate via http, so that > > means adding that too on broker and console sides. > > I think that's a better solution than saying "oh, hey, go download > this other random thing if you want authentication". That's just weak. > > - Aidan
