Hi Hiram, We don't have a preference in simple terms, but yes - the BDBStore is one way to plug persistence into Qpid. License issues are the reason why the hosting is detached.
We provide several config files and we documented them and the use of a 3rd party lib at: http://cwiki.apache.org/qpid/getting-started-guide.html and http://cwiki.apache.org/qpid/3rd-party-libraries.html hth, Marnie On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 9:48 PM, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > By the looks of the website documentation and example configs in the > source code, It looks like > org.apache.qpid.server.store.berkeleydb.BDBMessageStore is the > preferred persistence mechanism for QPID java. > > But it seems it's not actually hosted in the ASF source tree. What's > the story here? I'm guessing it was removed due to the BDB licensing > issues. But if so shouldn't the doco and configuration files get > updated? > > > -- > Regards, > Hiram > > Blog: http://hiramchirino.com > > Open Source SOA > http://open.iona.com >
