Thanks Robert: If you could, please tell me how I can find out the virtual
host name of a C++ broker. I have one running on a Linux system and I'm
trying to connect to it from a Windows Java client (the DeclareQueue.java
example). The client terminates after about 20 or so seconds of wait with
"Error connecting to broker" which is outputted in the "catch" section of
connection.  I've used an empty string for the virtual host name, and used
my root user and password to connect with. I think the problem may be that I
don’t have the correct virtual host name.  Would you know what I'm missing? 

Thank you in advance.

Kamran Saadatjoo

-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Greig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2008 1:16 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Communication problem between M3 Broker and AMQP client

2008/5/11 Kamran Saadatjoo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi everyone: I've downloaded and built the M3 version of QPID, and tried
to
> run the AMQP example DeclareQueue against the Java broker in this release.
> The error I'm receiving is "Unsupported protocol version: 0.10".  I would
> appreciate it if anyone could tell me what I'm doing wrong. I've made sure
> that the path, classpath, and the other environment variables point to the
> libraries in this release.

The java broker on trunk (i.e M3) does not yet support 0-10.

If you want to use that API you will need to use the C++ broker.

If you want to use a Java broker, I recommend you use the M2.1
release, and the M2.1 java client (which is JMS only).

Using trunk if you are just trying to explore qpid and get things up
and running isn't really recommended at this stage of the M3
development lifecycle - there are going to be bugs and issues and
missing or incomplete features.

Robert

Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
Checked by AVG. 
Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.22.13/1375 - Release Date: 4/12/2008
11:32 AM
 

Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
Checked by AVG. 
Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.22.13/1375 - Release Date: 4/12/2008
11:32 AM
 

Reply via email to