Hi thanks for the quick replies and questions i am currentlly trying to build a setup using the qpidd/or rhmd c++ borker and the c++ client , i intened to use the java/jms(i think jms) client as well
if i understand corectlly by your explanations there is no real reason to go back to M2.1 instead of using trunk i would like to achieve hi performence for mesage passing it apears that the c++ mesages accept only string objects and have a message overhead so i do not know how to check the actual messages size most my messages have "message data" of less than 500 characters some are a little bigger how can i tune the broker for best performence my current test have not come close to the promissed performence capabilities of the qpid please advise me how to achive this tuning i have tested on a quad core with 4 gigs of memory using centos last release. the box will be dedicated to this, so i can tune any part suggested by u Best Regards and thanks again Yoffe Mark On 5/17/08, Robert Greig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 2008/5/17 mark yoffe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > 2 - Is it problematic to use the trunk version in its current form ? > > 3 - what is the "future" plan for the trunk version (c++ broker > specificlly) > > , when is the Beta, or RC's planned as i currently see most efforts are > > directed towords M2.1(maybe M2.2 > > as M2.1 just released officially )? > > Mark, which clients are you planning on using? Are you planning on > using both C++ clients and broker? > > If you could describe what you are trying to do - i.e. your functional > and non-functional requirements - we could comment on that. > > RG >
