2008/10/1 Ted Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I mentioned the possibility of a JMX => QMF bridge (the opposite of QMan) > which will make JMX-manageable apps accessible through QMF. This is a > possible strategy for the Java broker.
I think that would be a good approach. >> Is SNMP on your roadmap or integration with widely use enterprise >> monitoring packages such as IBM Tivoli or Microsoft SCOM? >> > SNMP is not on *my* road map currently. I think that an SNMP bridge > (similar to the JMX one) would be very useful. One interesting aspect is > that QMF and JMX are self-describing whereas SNMP is not. There would need > to be a way to generate SNMP MIBs from QMF/JMX schemata. Or alternatively a > specification of a mapping from QMF/JMX to a MIB. Yes, if I put my corporate hat on I think that Qpid management needs to be able to integrate (somehow) with widely used enterprise monitoring tools - SCOM, Tivoli etc. In my current organisation, software (particularly infrastructure components like messaging) are very hard to introduce if they don't integrate with the established monitoring infrastructure. > One thing that I am thinking about is generating Syslog events from QMF > events. Yes, that would be a good idea since all (that I have seen) enterprise monitoring tools can leverage syslog. RG
