On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, Alan Brown wrote: > On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, Leonard Hermens wrote: > > > I agree, but it is indeed amusing to vent in that way. > > > > By using the incorrect term, we don't have to keep typing those TM symbols > > after all the common English words that MS has tradmarked. :-) > > And besides that, these clients really do deserve this invective. >
whether they deserve it is irrelevant. i dont see the beneficial result that defacing their name can have on the list, only to cause confusion. now if we were an email client list, with discussions about which clients were better/worse than others, then i might be able to see how your name-calling could influence someone not to use the client (but personally i would just call it what it is and then just go on to describe why said product sucks) end of rant :) --Tony .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._. Anthony J. Biacco Network Administrator/Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.asteroid-b612.org "It's hard work to fuck up, especially when you know what you're doing" --Me .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.
