At 8:29 PM +0100 6/11/06, Obantec Support wrote:

 Hi

 I am having file lock problems. 1 customer has a soft quota of 50MB and hard
 limit of 100MB and a 27MB mbox file.

 a snip of the logs shows

 Jun 11 12:00:46 proteus2 popper[6328]: martinco at 82.45.254.97
 (82.45.254.97): -ERR POP timeout from myservers.name.here
 Jun 11 19:27:25 proteus2 popper[4862]: (v4.0.8) Timeout (120 secs) during nw
 read from martinco at 82.45.254.97 (82.45.254.97)
 Jun 11 19:27:25 proteus2 popper[4862]: martinco at 82.45.254.97
 (82.45.254.97): -ERR POP timeout from myservers.name.here
 Jun 11 20:06:48 proteus2 popper[7819]: martinco at 82.45.254.97
 (82.45.254.97): -ERR [IN-USE] /var/mail/.martinco.pop lock busy!  Is another
 session active? (11)

Hi Mark,


I'm a bit confused. The 20:06:48 session should have been fine, since the 19:27:25 session should have ended after the timeout. Was the popper process for the user still active? Also, what does the spool being locked have to do with quotas?

 i need to resolve this by using a separate location for the .pop files with
 no quotas.
 i have the space on a second drive that is not using quotas.

 i started qpopper from command line with ./popper 111.222.333.444:110 -R

 so how do i migrate to the separate drive. my worry is those processes
 already running under /var/mail/spool/.username.pop

 do i have to recompile with

 ./configure --enable-standalone --enable-temp-drop-dir=/users/qpopper/mail
 make clean
 make
 make install

You can set the temp-drop-dir using a configuration file; that way you don't have to recompile. You can tell Qpopper to read a configuration file by adding the command-line flag for the flavor(s) of configuration files you'd like to use.

 or does qpopper run better under inetd?

Choosing to run from inetd or in daemon mode is independent of using other flags and options; you can mix and matcg.

--
Randall Gellens
Opinions are personal;    facts are suspect;    I speak for myself only
-------------- Randomly-selected tag: ---------------
Never ascribe to malice what can be adequately explained by incompetence.

Reply via email to