Hi
Even when I corrected the bad from lines, the popper would still give
the from lines error until I removed both X-UID lines. Then it popped no issue.
As far as the X-UID lines, I am certain popper puts them in there
when people set their client to leave mail on server.
So the difference I saw was the different type of X-UID written.
4.015 writes X-UIDL and 4.1 writes X-UID
I do not want to run traces until we agree on popper writing X-UID
lines :-) because I feel that is where the problem lies
Thanks
Mark
At 01:29 PM 7/27/2009, Randall Gellens wrote:
At 8:16 AM -0400 7/24/09, Mark wrote:
I installed the 4.1b17 and the problems between IMAP and qpopper
were magnified by a factor of 5. Using the 4.0xx series of qpopper
I would have an issue once in awhile and easily fix the From lines
being broken. After getting a rash of support calls and my support
staff having a mini melt down, I restored the 4.014 qpopper I was
running and everything went back to normal. Editing mail spools to
fix the broken From lines I noticed two X-UID lines in the header
which I did not see before.
For example:
normal everyday X-UIDL line
X-UIDL: c...@+"!-$`"!^gF"!^3f"!
and
X-UID:3
I assumed 4.b17 put the X-UID:3 in there and it was conflicting
with the old type of X-UIDL line because even fixing the From
lines people still could not pop those spools until I removed BOTH X-UID lines
Any ideas?
Thanks
Mark
Hi Mark,
Qpopper doesn't write "X-UID" lines. Maybe the IMAP server is doing
this? Even so, I'm not sure why there would be a difference between
4.0 and 4.1.
When you say users couldn't pop their mail until you deleted the
X--UID and X-UIDL lines, what was happening?
Would it be possible for you to reproduce the problem with Qpopper tracing?
To enable tracing in Qpopper in standalone mode:
1. Do a 'make clean'
2. Re-run ./configure, adding '--enable-debugging'.
4. Add '-t <tracefile-path>' to the command line for Qpopper.
This causes detailed tracing to be written to the file specified as
'tracefile-path'.
At 07:00 PM 7/23/2009, Randall Gellens wrote:
At 3:57 PM -0400 7/22/09, Mark wrote:
Does 4.1x write X-UID differently then 4.0x?
No, but there are several options which control if and how X-UID
is handled.
Are you seeing a problem with X-UIDL?
--
Randall Gellens
Opinions are personal; facts are suspect; I speak for myself only
-------------- Randomly selected tag: ---------------
You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say will be
misquoted, then used against you.
