On Thu, 31 Jul 2003, Meng Weng Wong wrote: > On Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 05:08:08PM -1000, James H. Thompson wrote: > | I found that speedyCGI worked much better than pperl -- at least on my systems. > > I was reading http://daemoninc.com/SpeedyCGI/ and saw: > > SpeedyCGI and PersistentPerl are currently both names for the same > code. SpeedyCGI was the original name, but because people weren't sure > what it did, the name PersistentPerl was picked as an alias. At some > point SpeedyCGI will probably be replaced by PersistentPerl, or become a > sub-class of PersistentPerl to avoid always having two distributions. > > Now I'm confused...
PersistentPerl != PPerl (even though my initial P stands for the same thing) Basically the difference between the two is that PPerl's daemon code is in Perl, whereas PersistenPerl's daemon is in C and embeds a perl interpreter. I wrote PPerl because I couldn't get PersistentPerl to compile (still can't) and the author never responded to my questions. If you find bugs in PPerl (like things that don't work) whittle it down to a small test case and it will get fixed. -- <!-- Matt --> <:->get a SMart net</:-> Spam trap - do not mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
