On Nov 17, 2004, at 18:45, Carlos Andrés Paz wrote:
I've been reading a lot about qpsmtpd and want to give it a try as an exclusive spam and virus gateway, but I'm concerned about it's performance... could anyone point me some information about memory footprint/cpu utilization/scalability/problems with the forkserver version?
On the apache.org mail server they saw the load *decreasing* after replacing qmail-smtpd with qpsmtpd. (This is because more viruses and spams are rejected more quickly before taking up resources to be processed).
- ask
-- http://www.askbjoernhansen.com/
