Andrew Pam wrote:

On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 07:32:52AM -0400, Bob wrote:


I want a host, so the last n ought not to be zero(most likely
a network),



That's your mistake. There is no rule that hosts can't have an IP address ending in zero. In any network larger than /24 it is perfectly legal and likely that there will be hosts where the last octet of the address is zero.

Hope that helps,
Andrew


Falling through bad input to giving away the store
is not my default(that would be "my mistake") for
cleartext exchanges. The law of averages carries a
lot of weight, and I would be a fool to be a scofflaw
there. The left lane is available.

What is astronomically more likely than an imaginary
ldap server host's ip ending in 0 is that a realworld
bad config was munged to "", became 0 as we in perl
so often use "" and 0 interchangeably, and bad code
fall though to 0.0.0.0. Then I don't DENY, I decline
to presume to sink my hook in my people's business
whilst they are probably just unawares(of THEIR
little mistake), as the law of averages would have it.

There is also the law of distinct possibilities. I'm
already bending over pretty far not to enforce
127.0.0.0/8 ip's for cleartext password exchanges.
I don't want to ruin somebody or get blamed.

Have you ever noticed that a lot of applications default
install on localhost? Ever noticed that reiserfs won't
boot without a human typing "Yes", case sensitive, before
doing anything(I can hack the code if I don't like it)?

If you have a real world application which needs ssl
ldap server, Net::LDAP has those calls.

-Bob Dodds

Reply via email to