> I think the consensus (in July/August 2004) was to use stunnel as a
> wrapper around qpsmtpd, e.g.
Thats not a solution for the problem. While this will enable SMTPS (which
happens to be the secure version of SMTP like HTTP/HTTPS), this is not of
much use as SMTPS is mostly dead in favor of TLS. TLS is a universal
approach to upgrade an insecure connection to a secured one, and as the
connection will switch inbetween this can't be accomplished using stunnel.
Regards
Michael
--
It's an insane world, but i'm proud to be a part of it. -- Bill Hicks
