On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 16:44, Elliot Foster wrote: > > > Yes, you could use sendmail and a milter instead of qpsmtpd, or you > could use a milter with qpsmtpd. What is your point? What > functionality is missing in qpsmtpd to which you're referring?
The one that brought up the issue was listening on multiple ports for ssl and smtp and perhaps the submission port too, and then you need starttls. > I would > argue that it would be easy to add anything to qpsmtpd that is missing. Possible, perhaps but it will be tough to match all the options or or the speed that sendmail processes things controlled by its access database. > I noticed you posted a while ago about using qpsmtpd's milters.. That > seems to be the best of both worlds for you: mimedefang with qpsmtpd > (which I would personally be interested in, too.) Did you have success > with that? It didn't just drop in and I haven't spent the time it would take to glue them together. Due to some business changes, the place where I thought I might want the combination isn't going to need it. It still seems like an interesting project, though. -- Les Mikesell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
