Last I had read it wasn't an order. It was something the spammers lawyer proposed. The judge has to sign it, and hasn't yet.
http://www.spamhaus.org/legal/answer.lasso?ref=3 http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/default+judgement ANYWAY - further discussion of the legal aspects of this are off topic for this list, please take them elsewhere. -R At Fri, 06 Oct 2006 16:18:01 -0700, Waitman Gobble wrote: > > The order was to ICANN regarding the domain name. It is a curious > situation though. > > > > Waitman > > > James Turnbull wrote: > > Matt Sergeant wrote: > >> http://wordtothewise.com/Spamhaus_ICANN_order.html > >> > >> If you're using sbl-xbl, consider temporarily switching to cbl until > >> this blows over. > > > > The order is essentially meaningless though isn't it? The associated > > judgement is unenforceable because Spamhaus isn't under the jurisdiction > > of US law - it's a UK entity. If Linhardt wants to stop them he is > > going to have to file the same case in a UK court and the laws regarding > > spam in the UK are considerably different. > > > > Regards > > > > James Turnbull > >
