Umut D. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> First of all, consider upgrading to qsheff-2.0-r2...

As I wrote before:

"I tested this with both qsheff releases: 2.0-r1 (and now 2.0-r2), and 1.0-r5 -"

There's no difference between r1 anf r2 in my case. :(

>Did you checked all of the configure parameters? This may be the cause:
>--enable-local-users           Filter local users

Of course, I did.

This options enables checking of locally relayed messages (IHMO is should be
enabled by default), so it has nothing to do with clamd socket operation in my
understanding.

In fact I testet r1, and r2 with and without this option, with clamd enabled,
and with clamd disabled plus CUSTOM_PROG set to clamdscan full path too.

No success at all! :( My qsheff is ignoring clamd at all (yes, during the
configuration of sources all loooks pretty good - ClamAV enabled, /tmp/clamd
socket found etc...).

Thanks to well configured qsheff.attach most of attachments carrying viruses are
denied, but really I just wanted to run it with clamd.

In general it looks to me, like a problem with internal clamd client - simply no
communication between qsheff, and clamd - but there's no SINGLE error message in
the logs. :(

I've already installed newest version of qsheff on four boxes (all are x86 based
mailserves) in all cases problem is exactly the same - qsheff simply ignores
clamd - or is not delivering any requests for scan to it - at least!

Bestest,
-Chris



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to