On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Konstantin Tokarev <[email protected]>wrote:
> > > 28.08.2012, 11:56, "Christian Kandeler" <[email protected]>: > > However, most of the time that is not the case, such as in > > this example: > > QStringList rc(QLatin1String(".svn")); > > #ifdef Q_OS_WIN > > rc.push_back(QLatin1String("_svn")); > > #endif > > return rc; > > The code would compile on any platform, but we hide it from the compiler > > and Qt Creator's code model on all of them except Windows. This means > > that if, for instance, you are developing on Linux and you are using > > Creator's refactoring support to rename the rc variable in the above > > example, Creator will miss the occurrence inside the #ifdef'ed block, as > > that one is not part of the code model. > > I think this issues is a fault of Qt Creator. While I understand that it > may be > impossible to parse disabled block completely in some cases (not in this > one > btw), it would be very desirable to support basic things like code > navigation and > variable renaming for disabled blocks too. Otherwise maintaining > cross-platform > code (not only for desktop platforms!) is sometimes painful. > +1 - Orgad
_______________________________________________ Qt-creator mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
