Hi, No good reason to not change the syntax to something more QML alike. Using QtQuick for diagrams would be much harder.
Regards, Jochen Am Dienstag, den 27.10.2015, 17:43 +0100 schrieb Jason H via Qt-creator: > I noticed the syntax was very close to QML ( > http://doc-snapshots.qt.io/qtcreator-3.6/creator-modeling.html ) : > Icon UseCase > Title: "Use-Case" > Elements: item > Stereotype: 'usecase' > Display: icon > Width: 40 > Height: 20 > BaseColor: #5fb4f0 > Begin > Ellipse 20, 10, 20, 10 > End > > Could be converted to: > > Icon { > id: useCase > elements: item > stereotype: 'usecase' > display: icon > width: 40 > height: 20 > baseColor: #5fb4f0 > visualization: Elipse { > x: 20 > y: 10 > width: 20 > height: 10 > } > //or > function draw() { > ... > } > } > > Was there a reason QML couldn't be used? > _______________________________________________ > Qt-creator mailing list > Qt-creator@qt-project.org > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator _______________________________________________ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
