On 01/13/2016 03:22 PM, Nikolai Kosjar wrote:
On 01/13/2016 01:52 PM, Joerg Bornemann wrote:
Still, as it came up, this argument raises the interesting question what
will happen to users of the clang code model that cannot switch to
(non-standard) pragma once for this or that reason?
What would it take to fix this problem? Can we work around it? Can we
provide an upstream fix?
A fix from Erik is pending for review at http://reviews.llvm.org/D15994
, but so far there were no comments.
It seems to have been accepted now. Which version will it end up in?
Christian
_______________________________________________
Qt-creator mailing list
Qt-creator@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
