> If you use GCC-based kit, you will use GCC implementation of UBSan instead of Clang's (GCC >= 4.9 required)
Ok, clear, I use GCC 5.xxx > UBSan is dynamic analysis tool, based on compiler instrumentation. It has nothing to do with static analysis. So, should I just run my app and see debug outputs? 2016-06-04 20:16 GMT+03:00 Konstantin Tokarev <[email protected]>: > > > 04.06.2016, 20:07, "Denis Shienkov" <[email protected]>: > >> As with other sanitizers, just add -fsanitize=undefined to > QMAKE_CXXFLAGS and QMAKE_LFLAGS > > > > 1. Should I use the Clang-based Kit and compile my sources with this > Kit, or I can use GCC-based kit for this? > > If you use GCC-based kit, you will use GCC implementation of UBSan instead > of Clang's (GCC >= 4.9 required) > > > 2. Is this will work when I click on "Analyze -> Clang Static Analyzer" > from the QtC menu? > > UBSan is dynamic analysis tool, based on compiler instrumentation. It has > nothing to do with static analysis. > > > > > 2016-06-04 19:39 GMT+03:00 Konstantin Tokarev <[email protected]>: > >> 04.06.2016, 19:27, "Denis Shienkov" <[email protected]>: > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> 1) is it possible to use the clang's UBSan with QtC? :) > >> > >> Why not? > >> > >>> > >>> 2) if yes - then how to do it? > >> > >> As with other sanitizers, just add -fsanitize=undefined to > QMAKE_CXXFLAGS and QMAKE_LFLAGS > >> > >>> > >>> 3) if yes - is it possible to use on Windows? > >> > >> > http://clang.llvm.org/docs/UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer.html#supported-platforms > >> > >>> > >>> BR, > >>> > >>> Denis > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Qt-creator mailing list > >>> [email protected] > >>> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator > >> > >> -- > >> Regards, > >> Konstantin > > > -- > Regards, > Konstantin >
_______________________________________________ Qt-creator mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
