Thanks Gunner for your quickly reply! Yes, the following launches are fast. I referred to the first start on a new machine. QtJambi create folder "QtJambi_<username>_x86_4.4.0_01_msvc2005-20080820-1526" in C:\Documents and Settings\<username>\Impostazioni locali\Temp. This operation is very time expensive. I would like to know if i can skip this operation.
Thank. Best Regards Max. 2008/9/8 Gunnar Sletta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Massimo Fazzolari wrote: > >> Hi Gunner, >> >> Thanks for reply. I need about 20 seconds to start a simple qtjambi >> application. I use QtJambi on Windows XP. This time is required by QtJambi >> jar file and Qt DLLs. Other java native application start-up immediatly. A >> native application like Chrome start-up in 3 seconds. How can reduce the >> QtJambi start-up time? >> > > This is odd. Starting com.trolltech.examples.AnalogClock for me takes about > a second on my XP machine. The very first start on a machine is a bit slower > (maybe 5 secs), but following launches are fast because the OS will cache > the dll's in memory. > > Does AnalogClock always take 20 secs for you? What kind of hardware / jvm > etc are you running this on? >
_______________________________________________ Qt-jambi-interest mailing list [email protected] http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-jambi-interest
