Hi, They do both the same my making JNI calls to native C++ libraries whereas on QTJambi the platform independency is done at the C++ level by their QT-libs whereas in SWT this is done partly at the SWT/Java level.
Another interesting difference is that QTJambi uses the Java Grabage collector so you don't need to dispose things but simply let them go out of scope you'll have to dispose things in SWT. Tom Luca Ferrari schrieb: > Hi all, > I wonder how the jambi works and how it compares to swt (sorry if the > question > is trivial). I mean, qt are written in c++, and maybe jambi makes the same > swt > does: it uses jni to call c++ native libraries. Is it true or jambi exploits > a > kind of swing approach, where components are emulated on a peer set of native > components? > Any pointer to a discussion/explanation of the above? > > Thanks, > Luca > _______________________________________________ > Qt-jambi-interest mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-jambi-interest _______________________________________________ Qt-jambi-interest mailing list [email protected] http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-jambi-interest
