Helge Fredriksen wrote: > That sounds really great! I think that one of the biggest problems for > Jambi gaining popularity so for has been the "not-so-user-friendly" > way of setting up and loading the libraries. > > Using this, will it be possible to build jambi as before using > ant to produce 2 separate jar files, one for binaries and one > for the class files? Or do you plan another bundling regime?
This option has been available since the very early releases of Qt Jambi. http://doc.trolltech.com/qtjambi-4.4/html/com/trolltech/qt/qtjambi-deployment.html#deploying-a-pure-qt-jambi-application How to create your own native library bundles using ant is explained here: http://doc.trolltech.com/qtjambi-4.4/html/com/trolltech/qt/qtjambi-deployment.html#create-a-platform-archive _______________________________________________ Qt-jambi-interest mailing list [email protected] http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-jambi-interest
