On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Dusan Zatkovsky <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thursday 15 of October 2009 10:25:49 Francis Galiegue wrote: > >> Will this change one day? If not, I'm afraid qt-jambi will never be >> able to be compiled by distributors, which is quite a pity :/ >> >> A separate qt-tools{,-devel} package someday, maybe? That would be >> convenient... > > I agree with this. Package maintainers won't use "-prefix $PWD", would they? > > Why not to install these files needed for jambi build together with make > install process? Maybe in separate directory, for example > $INSTALL_ROOT/usr/local/qt4/jambi-devel-stuff. Package maintainer should then > create separate package named "libqt4-jambi-dev" with that files and that > package should be used in qtjambi packaging process. >
The problem is that these files are bundled with qt, not qt-jambi. There is nothing that can be done at the qt-jambi level. What's more, there's the problem of juic that needs... uic.cpp from the qt sources as well! That is, if I read the build output properly... -- Francis Galiegue, [email protected] "It seems obvious [...] that at least some 'business intelligence' tools invest so much intelligence on the business side that they have nothing left for generating SQL queries" (Stéphane Faroult, in "The Art of SQL", ISBN 0-596-00894-5) _______________________________________________ Qt-jambi-interest mailing list [email protected] http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-jambi-interest
