Hi, Not sure what to suggest when it comes to whether using Qt-Jambi in commercial product but there are alternatives naturally:
* Swing * SWT integrates nicely on Win32 and MacOS-X as well as on Linux-Gnome I can point you also to a project I started some time ago named UFaceKit [1,2] which is hiding the real toolkit behind a facade and so allows you to defers the choice of the UI-ToolKit. LGPL is a quite commerical friendly license and even if you modify LGPL-Code you only have to contribute back the modified code and NOT publish your own (but I'm not a lawyer). It's really a bitty that Nokia took this step and on the other hand invested into a Qt-eSWT-Port on the other side. Please note eSWT != SWT. Tom [1]http://wiki.eclipse.org/UFaceKit [2]http://tomsondev.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/slides1.pdf Am 29.12.09 10:20, schrieb Bruno Wouters: > Hi all, > > > > I’m considering to use Qt Jambi for a new project. Is this a good choice > knowing that Nokia decided to discontinue development of it? Is the open > source community large enough to keep it alive/up to date? > > Are there other, better choices then Qt Jambi for a java application > that is going to be deployed on Windows and Mac OS X? It will be a > multilingual (also right-to-left languages) application taking care of > some administrative tasks (quite simple gui). > > And can I use Qt Jambi under the LGPL license (without changing the Qt > Jambi code) in a commercial application without providing the source > code of it? > > > > Thanks for your time! > > > > Kind regards, > > Bruno Wouters > > > > _______________________________________________ > Qt-jambi-interest mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-jambi-interest _______________________________________________ Qt-jambi-interest mailing list [email protected] http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-jambi-interest
