Hi Alex,

thanks for the fair answer.

Just out of curiosity, what is going to happen to the rest of
QtMobility APIs for the Qt5 time frame: will they also follow suit and
migrate to Qt?

 ~ Akos.



On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 00:52,  <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: [email protected]
>>[mailto:qt-mobility-feedback-
>
> First of all, thank you for the honest feedback.
>
>>I was really disappointed with reverse geocoding of qtmobility.
>>
>>I had done a application with qtmobility 1.0.1 at that time reverse
>>geocoding was not available. So I used google web API and
>>QNetworkAccessManager
>>to do the job. Now when its available I tried it and results were not so good.
>>First all I need is an address from a coordinate, and I get a list of
>>places. Now I have to see how many places it returned? how close are
>>they to the lat/lon
>>that I provided for reverse coding. Even after doing that level of
>>detail was very poor. Best address I got was:
>>south bangalore, karnataka, india.
>>while with google I was getting the sub-street also. and it was
>>conveniently available as a string in returned json. It also has lot
>>of other details nearby things.
>>But at the top of the json there was the best possible resolved it
>>could get (provide a similar api).
>
> I agree that the returned information is very marginal at best. I am equally 
> frustrated about the current situation as you are.
>
> We have recognised this and are working on improvements. Unfortunately this 
> will not happen in QtMobility anymore but Qt5. The beginnings of the new 
> places/search API can already be seen in the qt5 git repos. It will provide a 
> much better resolution and place search. The new API will utilize better 
> content providers as well.
>
>>And in general I have seen a lot of qtmobility like this:
>>"if backend does this.... then this.... Backend may do that. Now where
>>is this documentation what does a backend actually do, say symbian or
>>maemo backend.
>>And if you start coding keeping in mind all these "backend may do this
>>and that", code will turn out to be a mess.
>
> In general there is no difference between Harmattan and Symbian. They use the 
> same REST server but that's of course only a small consolation given the 
> greater context. I'll make sure that this feedback is passed on to the 
> REST/content guys. On device search is always going to be limited as there is 
> simply not enough space on a device.
>
> --
> Alex
> _______________________________________________
> Qt-mobility-feedback mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-mobility-feedback
>
_______________________________________________
Qt-mobility-feedback mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-mobility-feedback

Reply via email to