We are considering it. This might have some implications for our internal development setup which we need to investigate first. This shouldn't take too long. I will let you know once we have come to a conclusion.
-- Alex >-----Original Message----- >From: ext Cornelius Hald [mailto:[email protected]] >Sent: Wednesday, 24 November 2010 21:05 >To: Tico Ballagas >Cc: Blasche Alex (Nokia-MS-Qt/Brisbane); qt-mobility- >[email protected] >Subject: Re: [Qt-mobility-feedback] QTM 1.1 packages for Maemo 5 > >+1 That would be great indeed. > >Also thanks Alex for your reply. > >Cheers, >Conny > > >On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 10:23 -0800, Tico Ballagas wrote: >> I wanted to reiterate the request for opening the debian folder. This >is something that is done in the main qt source tree here: >> git://gitorious.org/+qt-developers/qt/x11-maemo.git >> >> Why is it not appropriate for qt mobility? It would greatly simplify >testing and promote community involvement in QA. >> >> -Tico >> >> On Nov 22, 2010, at 4:08 AM, <[email protected]> ><[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Hi Cornelius, >> > >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> From: [email protected] [mailto:qt- >mobility- >> >> [email protected]] On Behalf Of ext Cornelius Hald >> > >> >> now that 1.1 has been released, can we get Maemo5 packages >somewhere? >> >> The version in extras-devel is still 1.0.2. >> > >> > The binaries are done and we are currently testing them. It is >difficult to make a prediction about the QA timeline but this shouldn't >take too long anymore. >> > >> > -- >> > Alex >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Qt-mobility-feedback mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-mobility-feedback >> > _______________________________________________ Qt-mobility-feedback mailing list [email protected] http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-mobility-feedback
