Hi, Mario, could you please elaborate a bit more on your negative experiences?
We are considering using QML in a production mobile client, where the intention is to use it for a "thin" UI layer, so the real functionality is implemented in Qt C++, but is this a risky strategy? Is QML still only suitable for demos? ;-) So far we have made some UI prototypes, and even on old Windows Mobile handsets, they worked pretty ok... Thanks, Bo On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Mario Negro Ponzi < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi, my experience is negative. > I'm creating a relative simple app and I did discover some very serious > issues that are blocking me (or at least slowing me down a lot trying to > find workarounds). > > As said before also my impression is that QML is ready for animating the > UI, but it's way better to keep anything non trivial in C++. And there are > some bugs affecting the phone which don't show up in the desktop. > > I would keep an eye on > > http://bugreports.qt.nokia.com/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+QTBUG+AND+resolution+%3D+Unresolved+AND+component+%3D+%22Declarative+%28QML%29%22+ORDER+BY+priority+DESC&mode=hide > to get a feeling of where QML is right now. > > And check also where qtmobility is in case you need it ;-) > > And no, afaik you can't publish to the OVI store QML apps, yet. > > Having said that, QML is a *fantastic* technology and I can't wait for it > to be ready. I was also quite impressed by the performance it can achieve on > the relatively low-end Nokia 5230. > > > cheers, > Mario > > On 15 March 2011 12:05, Adriano Gil <[email protected]> wrote: > >> What about Qt 4.7 for symbian^3? >> Is there an official .sis package or only the developer version? >> >> Can I submit a QML app to OVI Store right now? >> >> cheers >> >> Adriano >> >> 2011/3/1 Jason H <[email protected]> >> >>> In my limited experience, I would also agree. I've been running QML >>> animations >>> for weeks and no memory leaks, no slow-downs. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- Original Message ---- >>> From: Andre Somers <[email protected]> >>> To: [email protected] >>> Sent: Tue, March 1, 2011 3:39:35 AM >>> Subject: Re: [Qt-qml] Is QML ready for 'production' purposes? >>> >>> Op Di, 1 maart, 2011 9:25 am, schreef Tim O'Callaghan: >>> > I've had this question come up, as a form of push-back to use QWidget, >>> > and and I'm curious to the 'official' line on this. >>> >>> That would depend on what you are producing, I think. Is it ready to >>> completely replace everything you did so far with widgets? No. Is it >>> ready >>> to use in scenarios where QML shines, like highly graphical, animated >>> interfaces that don't have to look native? Yes. >>> >>> André >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Qt-qml mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-qml >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Qt-qml mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-qml >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Qt-qml mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-qml >> >> > > > -- > > > Mario Negro Ponzi > Mobile: +31.6.3456.1669 > Address: Kogerwatering 2, 1541XC, Koog aan de Zaan > > > _______________________________________________ > Qt-qml mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-qml > >
_______________________________________________ Qt-qml mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-qml
